Which Supreme Court decision noted that moving radar does not require auto locks?

The correct response is based on the Supreme Court decision in the case of State vs. Hanson, which clarified that moving radar does not necessitate the use of auto locks for evidence to be deemed valid in speed detection cases. This ruling is significant as it allows law enforcement officers to utilize moving radar devices without the extra requirement of auto locks, streamlining the process of speed enforcement.

The decision emphasizes the reliability of moving radar technology in accurately measuring the speed of vehicles in motion without the need for additional locking mechanisms. This aligns with the practical application of radar technology in real-world scenarios where immediate speed assessments are critical for enforcement actions.

Other cases mentioned may involve different aspects of speed detection or legal standards but do not specifically address the requirement for auto locks in the context of moving radar, making State vs. Hanson the relevant and correct choice for this question.